<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FrostWurks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frostwurks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frostwurks.com</link>
	<description>Reviews and RESULTS of the latest affiliate marketing products and tips on making money online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PLRPro 3.0 Review by Liz</title>
		<link>http://frostwurks.com/plrpro-3-0-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostwurks.com/?p=43#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hi Jennifer
I have to agree with you. I have been buying the articles for several months are they are all very poor quality and do contain a lot of useless filler sentences, are mostly pointless and were not written by English first language speakers. I&#039;ve decided to re-write them loosely but if that doesn&#039;t work out, I&#039;ll drop it soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer<br />
I have to agree with you. I have been buying the articles for several months are they are all very poor quality and do contain a lot of useless filler sentences, are mostly pointless and were not written by English first language speakers. I&#8217;ve decided to re-write them loosely but if that doesn&#8217;t work out, I&#8217;ll drop it soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PLRPro 3.0 Review by Mary</title>
		<link>http://frostwurks.com/plrpro-3-0-review/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostwurks.com/?p=43#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I want to share my experience as a member of PLR PRO 3.0. When I received the email about the new PLR PRO 3.0 I joined immediately. But then I was a little disappointed. First, PLR PRO offered 250 &quot;spun&quot; articles a month to each member, which I received. Maybe I just misunderstood, but I thought I was going to receive spun articles, and no body else was going to have the same 100 % exact articles. I was wrong. A few days later, I found the same articles, word by word, in blogs, websites, well, almost everywhere. I contacted them and this was their explanation : 

&quot;PLRPro articles are unique in a sense that they have up to 73% different wordings, phrases, sentences than other articles. They may have similarities with other articles but rest assured that the articles have sufficient variation for them to be termed as &quot;unique&quot; in a PLR sense.
I apologize for any inconvenience and misunderstanding. Dan and Marc may have sent you an email regarding uniqueness of PLRPro articles. &quot;

In conclusion, if you don&#039;t mind sharing the same 250 articles with 500 other members, feel free to join. For some of us, quality is more important that quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to share my experience as a member of PLR PRO 3.0. When I received the email about the new PLR PRO 3.0 I joined immediately. But then I was a little disappointed. First, PLR PRO offered 250 &#8220;spun&#8221; articles a month to each member, which I received. Maybe I just misunderstood, but I thought I was going to receive spun articles, and no body else was going to have the same 100 % exact articles. I was wrong. A few days later, I found the same articles, word by word, in blogs, websites, well, almost everywhere. I contacted them and this was their explanation : </p>
<p>&#8220;PLRPro articles are unique in a sense that they have up to 73% different wordings, phrases, sentences than other articles. They may have similarities with other articles but rest assured that the articles have sufficient variation for them to be termed as &#8220;unique&#8221; in a PLR sense.<br />
I apologize for any inconvenience and misunderstanding. Dan and Marc may have sent you an email regarding uniqueness of PLRPro articles. &#8221;</p>
<p>In conclusion, if you don&#8217;t mind sharing the same 250 articles with 500 other members, feel free to join. For some of us, quality is more important that quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PLRPro 3.0 Review by sue</title>
		<link>http://frostwurks.com/plrpro-3-0-review/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 21:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostwurks.com/?p=43#comment-18</guid>
		<description>thank you for your honest appraisal of this new offering.  I was sorry to hear of the limitations, especially since I would not likely use all the niches anyway as many of the niches would likely be so obscure as to possibly have little commercial value though they say keyword rich it doesn&#039;t mean commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for your honest appraisal of this new offering.  I was sorry to hear of the limitations, especially since I would not likely use all the niches anyway as many of the niches would likely be so obscure as to possibly have little commercial value though they say keyword rich it doesn&#8217;t mean commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

